13
Apr 09Thesis update

One of the issues I have had with my MediaWiki (wikipedia software) redesign has been my lack of redesigning anything but the obvious. That changed recently when I started thinking about what collaboration even means. Why this model? How might it work if we could do anything?
Among many other areas, I started looking deeply into the history of an article. So after 3 or so pages of hand drawn pages, and endless arrows and notes, I felt I was ready to move onto illustrator. What I came up with so far has is a completely new way to visualize and deal with the pages history. This new system would allow a user to quickly see the size of the changes, and pinpoint when the article was reverted (in pink). Clicking on a change would show the article below in the same window. Currently you need to go back and forth between pages if you want to view multiple points of the pages history. You can also see a comparison between historic-pages, though currently not very user friendly. In this version you can easily select two points to see the differences. This doesn’t change much about how the system works, but I think I makes the way of looking/using at history much more elegant. One feature I think may be useful, is the ability to highlight changes made only certain users, or only changes made to certain sections. Perhaps search the notes and show/highlight history nodes containing that information (for molly).
An other area I have been looking at is… Imagine this scenario: You are viewing a page on Wikipedia, but 10sec before you loaded that pages, someone inserted false information. Normally content on wikipedia is somewhere above 90% accurate. But this comes from the mass amount of people being to oversee the article. This also means that older content has the highest probability for being correct, and newer the lowest. In this scenario, this 10sec old content is wrong, but there is no way of knowing it. The user could check the history, but this, in my mind, is too much to ass of the user. So… What if the reader could know that that content is very new and has that higher risk? What I am looking at is a way to color code data(can be toggled on/off) so that users can see what information has a high risk, and also what has been highly reviewed. Perhaps a yellow background on content that has not had the possibility for that that pier review? Maybe a light blue for information you can trust?
When the Ideas come, they don’t stop. I work up early on friday to get some work done before I went to my last day of my winter internship at